Phone: (817) 793-3060
Phone: (817) 793-3060
Jesus’ Teaching on the Kingdom: Matthew Now the attention is on Matthew’s witness. Matthew’s Gospel is perhaps the “Jewish” of the Gospels. These lectures have been taken from the course ‘Biblical Theology of the New Testament’ at Telos Biblical Institute 7.KingdomTeachings4 Jesus’ Teaching on the Kingdom : Acts 1:6 (Pts. 1 & 2) The question… Continue Reading
Jesus’ Teaching on the Kingdom: Luke (Pt.1) This study tracks the way Jesus Himself spoke about the Kingdom of God. This and the next lecture focus on Luke’s Gospel. 4.Kingdom 1 Jesus’ Teaching on the Kingdom: Luke (Pt.2) 5.KingdomTeachings2 Jesus’ Teaching on the Kingdom: John 6.KingdomTeachings3 … Continue Reading
These lessons take a look at how amillennialists and others interpret much prophecy
Dr Henebury has been teaching that the New Covenant is needed to enable the other unilateral covenants to be (literally) fulfilled. He has also pointed out that the New Covenant is a Person (Christ – Isa. 49:8). But it is in Jeremiah and Ezekiel where the confluence of the covenants together in the Kingdom Age is most clearly seen.
This lecture highlights the subtle but crucial differences between a covenant and a promise, and how this can affect the way we read the Bible. Also coming under scrutiny is the popular “promise – fulfillment” scheme.
These lectures inquire whether the Promise – Fulfillment scheme and the belief that the NT is required to interpret the OT makes sense.
These lectures stress how crucial Biblical Covenants (as opposed to theologically contrived covenants) are for the interpretation of the whole Bible.
“
From what I have written in support of this definition several things come out:
1. Revelation is, for the most part, unambiguous clear communication or it is not good communication
2. The progressive revealing must be amenable to tracking so as to ensure it is cohesive and non-contradictory.
3. The idea of progressive revelation, then, also carries the notion of expectancy, based on the content of what God revealed.”
“
“This brings us to a fourth observation: the “progression” was merely that of historical pronouncements couched in types and shadows, not in plain language. All that is meant by “progressive” is “communication at different times.” Meanwhile, all “revelation” turns out to be is “obtuse disclosure” which would remain unclear and misleading until the “fulfillment” was announced!”
As previously noted here, I was asked to represent Traditional Dispensationalism for a set of interviews conducted by Lindsay Kennedy. Two far more noteworthy contributors; Darrell Bock (Progressive Dispensationalism), and James Hamilton (Historic Premillennialism), were also interviewed. After the interviews were completed, each man was given the opportunity to ask one of the others a… Continue Reading
There is no content to display.